top of page

The New Wave of Unionization: Tracing Back to Poor Leadership Skills

In the intricate dance of workplace dynamics, the quality of leadership often sets the tone, not only for the immediate work environment but also for the broader organizational culture. A fascinating, albeit concerning, phenomenon emerges when leadership fails to meet the expectations and needs of its workforce: an uptick in union organizing efforts. This is not a coincidence nor a mere reaction to unfavorable conditions, but a deeply rooted response to a lack of effective leadership. This blog post dives into why poor leadership can inadvertently become the catalyst for robust union organizing efforts, weaving together the threads of workplace democracy, employee empowerment, and the quest for a fair and respectful work environment.

And if there are signs of union organization, the organization is probably too late to respond. 

The Void of Poor Leadership

At the heart of any organization lies its leadership, whose role transcends mere decision-making and strategy. Effective leaders are visionaries who inspire, motivate, and genuinely care for their team. However, when leaders falter, the void they leave is palpable. Poor leadership is characterized by a lack of communication, disregard for employee well-being, arbitrary decision-making, and a failure to recognize and reward contributions. This void creates a fertile ground for discontent, as employees feel undervalued, unheard, and often exploited.

The Spark of Unionization

Union organizing efforts are not merely responses to inadequate wages or poor working conditions; they are fundamentally about power, respect, and having a collective voice. When leaders fail to provide these, unionization becomes an attractive avenue for change. Employees seek to fill the leadership void by banding together, aiming to establish a counterbalance to managerial power. The organizing effort thus becomes a quest for a democratic voice in the workplace, where decisions affecting workers' lives are made collaboratively, rather than imposed from above.

The Drive for Empowerment

Empowerment is at the core of why employees turn to unions in the face of poor leadership. Unions offer a platform for workers to regain control over their work lives, providing mechanisms for collective bargaining, grievance resolution, and fair labor practices. This empowerment is not just about addressing immediate grievances; it's about fundamentally changing the dynamics of the workplace, ensuring that employees are partners in the organization's journey, not just cogs in a machine.

The Search for Fairness and Respect

Poor leadership often manifests in a lack of fairness and respect in the workplace. Favoritism, inconsistent policies, and a disregard for employee input can erode the moral fabric of an organization. Unions, in this context, emerge as beacons of fairness, advocating for transparent policies, equitable treatment, and a culture of respect. The unionization effort is thus not just a battle for better wages or conditions but a fight for dignity and respect in the workplace.

The Response to a Crisis of Leadership

Union organizing efforts in the wake of poor leadership can be seen as a natural response to a crisis of leadership. Employees, in their quest for a better work environment, turn to collective action as a means of instilling the values and practices absent from their current leadership. This collective action is a powerful statement of workers' unwillingness to accept subpar leadership and their determination to seek a more democratic, fair, and respectful workplace.

The Role of Leadership in Shaping Union Dynamics

Interestingly, the quality of leadership not only catalyzes union organizing efforts but also shapes the nature of union-management relationships. Enlightened leaders who recognize the value of unions can foster collaborative relationships, viewing unions as partners rather than adversaries. Conversely, leaders who continue to resist and undermine union efforts only deepen the divide, proving the very point that drove employees to unionize.


The Change in Union Organizing Efforts in 2024

According to Cozen O’Connor attorneys, the Cemex decision handed down by the National Labor Relations Board (NRLB has changed organizing efforts and it is not good news for employers.   Previously there was one path to unionization (30% of workers signing authorization cards, which triggered a secret election).   Now, if a majority of workers sign authorization cards, a union can demand recognition.   Learn more here.  


The Silver Lining: A Call for Transformative Leadership

While poor leadership can indeed spur union organizing efforts, there's a silver lining. These situations present a unique opportunity for transformative change, both for leaders and organizations. Recognizing the underlying issues that drive unionization can lead to introspection and a reevaluation of leadership styles and organizational culture. Embracing the principles of fairness, respect, and collaboration (as part of a leadership development program) can transform the workplace, reducing the need for adversarial union efforts and fostering a more harmonious and productive work environment.



In conclusion, the relationship between poor leadership and robust union organizing efforts is both complex and instructive. Poor leadership creates a vacuum that employees seek to fill through collective action, driven by a desire for empowerment, fairness, respect, and a voice in their workplace. This dynamic underscores the critical importance of effective leadership in maintaining a healthy, productive, and harmonious work environment. However, it also highlights the resilience of workers and their capacity to organize for change in the face of adversity. In the end, the rise of union organizing efforts in response to poor leadership is not just a challenge but an opportunity for organizations to evolve, embrace change, and forge a more inclusive, democratic, and respectful workplace culture.

Talent Authority Tip: Executive leaders must support and advocate for great leadership development throughout the organization. Then, they must reinforce the development and circle back to the importance of skills taught so great leadership skills show up every day.  The hard part of leadership development is not taking time to attend training, but on apply the skills every day.

32 views0 comments


bottom of page